Thursday, February 7, 2019

Arda in Terms of Utopias/Dystopias (Samir)

Short Disclaimer: I don't really have space to explain all of the elements of the plot in The Silmarillion, The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit,  and Tolkien's other books that take place in this universe, so I'm not going to (also, if you haven't at least read some of The Lord of the Rings or The Hobbit then you should be doing that instead of reading my blog post anyway).

Within the universe of J.R.R. Tolkien's trilogy The Lord of the Rings, there are many civilizations that resemble our own in that they are neither utopias nor dystopias (interestingly, these tend to be the human civilizations). However, there are also several pockets of life that could be described as utopias. The most obvious forms of utopia in Tolkien's universe are those inhabited by the elves, who seem to live in continual happiness when they are not at war. In particular, in the elves' second home, known as Valinor the gods of Tolkien's universe (the Valar) live among the elves and they are all happy. The Shire is another Utopia that exists within this universe, and it is inhabited by Hobbits. There are not many dystopias in Tolkein's universe, and the few that do exist were created by Melkor (aka Morgoth who is basically Tolkein's version of the devil, and aside from stupid things that humans do, essentially the only reason anything goes wrong in Arda) or his servants.

There are two main kingdoms of Elves in Middle Earth during the events of The Lord of the Rings, Lothlorien and Rivendell, though there were others before them. Both of them have several characteristics that I believe make them utopias. Aside from the fact that no one ever dies in either of these kingdoms (the elves are immortal unless they are murdered, and no enemy ever enters either kingdom), the two kingdoms exist in balance with themselves. Neither kingdom has issues with corruption, poverty, or disease, and both kingdoms are known for their prosperity and how they live harmony with the natural world. Most importantly however, all of the elves that live there are happy (when they are not at war with Sauron, which is most of their existence).

Similarly, in Valinor, the elves live in harmony with the gods of Arda (except Eru Illuvitar, this universe's creator who does not live on Arda). Again, elves are immortal unless murdered and the Valar are also immortal so no one dies in Valinor (which leads us to the nickname of the continent that Valinor is on: the undying lands). There are a bunch of different places in Valinor, which correspond to the realms of the different gods, but the important thing about them is that they're all paradises (except Mandos' area but that's essentially an afterlife. It's a little more complicated than that, especially for elves, but you get the point). Unsurprisingly, everyone in Valinor is also happy, and that's where the majority of the elves live.

The Shire is another place in Arda that is utopian. It is less of a utopia than the homes of the elves as  hobbits are mortal (though they live much longer than humans), and they have petty issues, but it's still essentially a utopia. For one thing, the issues that they do have are extremely minor (almost always neighborly disagreements about noise levels, etc.). The prosperity of their society is well represented in the number of meals that all hobbits eat in a day--six. Hobbits are essentially ungoverned (there is a system of government in place but it really doesn't do anything and isn't required to), which means no corruption or systematic oppression. Poverty also doesn't really seem to be a thing that they have issues with even though there are different classes. Most importantly, again, everyone there is happy and content (which is why everyone thinks its so weird when Bilbo helps the dwarves in the events of The Hobbit).

The kingdoms of humans (and there are a lot of them, though most of them collapse one way or another), are pretty normal societies. Human societies (like Gondor and Lake Town) have issues with corruption in the ruling class (like the Master and the Steward of Gondor). Their governments are much more oppressive of their people, and spend more of their time trying to maintain their power. Gondor goes through a number of civil wars due disputes over claims to the throne, and eventually the reign of Gondor is given to stewards because a proper heir cannot be discovered. Essentially, the kingdoms of humans function a lot like real human civilizations  (not very utopian if you ask me, but the governments are not oppressive enough to be dystopian).

Dystopias also appear in Tolkien's universe, though there are not many. The kingdoms of orcs (also inhabited by trolls, etc.) seem dystopian, though we don't learn much about them. They live in places like Gundabad or Mordor, which are particularly desolate areas of Middle Earth. Orcs are elves who were corrupted by Morgoth, which basically means their only goal is to ruin everything for everyone else, including each other unless one of their leaders is present. Any servant of Melkor is essentially his slave, and is usually also overseen by more powerful servants. Places where orcs live have a lot of violence, slavery, and oppression for each other, and even worse for those who don't serve Melkor. They are also by far the most warlike civilization; the servants of Melkor cause almost every single war in Arda.

Although the main focus of all of the stories that Tolkien wrote about his universe is on the interactions between these civilizations, the people who inhabit them, etc., these civilizations could also be used to analyze our own in a similar way to those of utopian/dystopian novels. Though not all of it is realistic, I think it's instructive that the civilizations with less class divisions are more utopian, and so are the civilizations that are more peaceful. Humans and orcs are the two most warlike and most hierarchical groups, and they are also the most unhappy. Comparing that to our society is definitely disturbing, what do you guys think?

8 comments:

  1. Nice Post! I had never really thought about the elves as a Utopia before (aside from Valinor which I didn't really know much about). I think it would be pretty interesting to compare the societies of Hobbits and Elves as well because I feel like they are very different kinds of Utopias. The Shire seems to be all about peace, freedom, and having fun in fairly innocent, non-competitive, easy ways (like dancing, fireworks, drinking which I guess is less innocent but no one every seems to be angry and drunk), and everyone there seems really happy. While in the Elvish societies (which are slightly different from one another) it seems like everyone is happy, but everything is much more calm, subdued, and intellectual and it seems like a very different view of the way people should live their lives (seems more focused on happiness through doing things rather than happiness through playing around). I completely agree about the socio-economic aspects of the two societies (although I think the elves are somewhat hierarchical they certainly don't have poverty) and it does seem like Tolkien could be making a point about our society with the utopias being the way they are.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm loving this cross-literary analysis. I don't know how much conscious cultural criticism Tolkien was trying to make, but the way he writes definitely speaks to what he thinks makes happy societies (i.e. socioeconomic equality, peaceable, not being human). I would also mention that orcs, trolls, etc. are more beastlike and frequently controlled by a dictator or militaristic hierarchy, but they also tend to live in ruined wastelands (naturally or by their own doing), so they would be fighting over fewer resources, which causes strife (would a comfortable and well-led orc live peaceably with hobbits? How much is environmental?). Elves, on the other hand, are sort of superhuman as opposed to subhuman, and that relates directly to their utopia: it would be hard to keep order if everyone weren't immortal. Perhaps there's kind of a scale, from Elves > Hobbits > Humans > Orcs, of human-ness as it relates to capacity for utopia? I wonder where Ents and other races fit in there.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really have no context for saying anything meaningful about these books. What I will say is that having relative equality, peace (few wars), lack of poverty, and the other aspects of the Elves/Hobbit societies that you deem Utopian wouldn't necessarily make the inhabitants any happier on average (I guess it might depend on how one calculates an "average").

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think this is a very interesting comparison although it could be possible to define the World State in Brave New World as a Shire like utopia too then. Everyone in the World State seems happy, with a few exceptions, there doesn't seem to be any poverty and the society seems prosperous enough to support the extravagant games and technology that they have. But the World State seems more like the Orcs, with the violent oppression and essentially slavery that the lower Castes are treated to. Very interesting comparisons that you bring up!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This in-depth analysis of utopian/dystopian elements in Tolkien's works was really interesting, and I was particularly intrigued by the interaction that you brought up between these contrasting societies. In particular, the way that the elves' isolated utopia is disrupted by wars with Sauron brings up the question of whether or not a utopian environment is truly feasible. If a utopia exists separately from another community, but the other community is aware of the utopia, there would surely be some jealousy and resentment, and interactions between the two would almost surely lead to conflict, potentially ruining what could have been an ideal society. It seems that a utopia would only have any real chance at existence if it was either completely isolated, or encompassed an entire civilization (all of the societies that came into contact with each other).

    ReplyDelete
  6. This was very interesting, and well thought out. I think it might be easier for the elves to create Utopian societies, since, as you point out, they're immortal unless killed. With that in mind, it seems like they might be able to avoid all the concerns humans have about securing a legacy, or securing any number of advantages for themselves.
    -Sasha

    ReplyDelete
  7. Having read Tolkien's amazing trilogy, I completely agree with your observations. I believe the Lord of the Rings is unique because it has both utopias and dystopias. The Shire is undoubtedly a utopia filled with innocent hobbits. Reading your post made me realize how utopian and dystopian the Lord of the Rings trilogy was, and I will probably read the series again in the near future. Personally, the Tolkien trilogy gives off a different dystopian vibe than Brave New World and Handmaid's Tale.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Full disclosure: I've never read these books. But, I think you hit on some interesting points. More inequality almost always leads to conflict. However, too much equality also oddly leads to some conflict. Regardless, it's interesting to see this portrayed across different kinds of media.

    ReplyDelete

Heeheeheehoo

In our ongoing discussion of stress, I’ve seen/heard a fairly consistent theme, which is that we should actively work to avoid and reduce...